Does FSGNJN.S change the NaN payload?
No. Except for the sign-bit rule, rs1 exponent and significand fields are preserved; the instruction does not canonicalize NaNs.
The result keeps rs1 exponent and significand fields, while the sign bit is the inverse of the rs2 sign.
FSGNJN.S only recombines the sign bit of a single-precision floating-point encoding: exponent and significand fields come from rs1, while the sign bit is the inverse of the rs2 sign. It performs no floating-point arithmetic, does not round, sets no floating-point exception flags, and does not canonicalize NaNs.
Shows the F-extension single-precision OP-FP flow: decode fields, read FP operands, perform FSGNJN semantics, then write rd.
The word is split as an R-type OP-FP instruction; single-precision OP-FP instructions use opcode 1010011.
Sign injection only recombines the floating-point sign bit: exponent and significand fields come from rs1, while the sign bit follows the current instruction rule from rs2 or the rs1/rs2 sign relation; it does not round or canonicalize NaNs.
Sign injection only recombines the floating-point sign bit: exponent and significand fields come from rs1, while the sign bit follows the current instruction rule from rs2 or the rs1/rs2 sign relation; it does not round or canonicalize NaNs.
This animation shows only F-extension ISA-visible OP-FP encoding, example numeric results, and fflags relationship; it does not model FPU pipelines, latency, every IEEE 754 corner case, or microarchitecture.
FSGNJN.S is an F-extension OP-FP sign-injection instruction. The key points are how funct5/fmt/funct3 identify FSGNJN.S, and that the result only replaces the sign bit without rounding or fflags updates.
Understand this scenario with real code like «fsgnjn.s f0, f1, f1 # FNEG.S: f0 = -f1 (sign flip only)».
Understand this scenario with real code like «fsgnjn.s f0, f1, f1 # FNEG.S: f0 = -f1 (sign flip only)».
No. Except for the sign-bit rule, rs1 exponent and significand fields are preserved; the instruction does not canonicalize NaNs.
No. It is a bit-level sign operation in FP registers and does not perform rounded arithmetic or exception-flag paths.