Does FENCE flush caches?
No. Its architectural semantics are ordering constraints, not a general cache flush.
Order the current hart's memory reads/writes and device I/O operations according to pred/succ sets.
FENCE uses pred and succ fields to name predecessor and successor operation sets: I for device input, O for device output, R for memory reads, and W for memory writes. It constrains the ordering of memory and I/O operations made observable by the current hart to other harts or external devices; standard software should set reserved rd and rs1 fields to zero.
Shows the FENCE opcode encoding, fm/pred/succ fields, and current-hart observable ordering constraints without modeling cache, bus, or pipeline behavior.
This animation shows only FENCE/PAUSE architectural semantics defined by the RISC-V unprivileged ISA; it does not represent processor-specific pause duration, cache behavior, interconnect protocol, or execution cost.
FENCE is not a cache flush. It uses pred/succ bit sets to describe which predecessor operations must be observed before which successor operations.
Understand this scenario with real code like «fence rw, rw # full memory barrier: prior reads+writes before subsequent reads+writes».
Understand this scenario with real code like «fence rw, rw # full memory barrier: prior reads+writes before subsequent reads+writes».
Understand this scenario with real code like «fence rw, rw # full memory barrier: prior reads+writes before subsequent reads+writes».
No. Its architectural semantics are ordering constraints, not a general cache flush.
No for I/O classes. Device input/output ordering requires the I or O bits as appropriate.
No. It constrains the order in which the current hart's relevant operations become observable to other observers.