Does FENCE flush caches?
No. Its architectural semantics are ordering constraints, not a general cache flush.
Order the current hart's memory reads/writes and device I/O operations according to pred/succ sets.
32-bit MISC-MEM fields: fm[31:28], pred[27:24], succ[23:20], rs1[19:15], funct3=000, rd[11:7], opcode=0001111; these are not an arithmetic immediate.
pred/succ select I=1000, O=0100, R=0010, W=0001 operation sets. Normal fm=0000; standard software must zero rs1/rd.
Orders the current hart's selected predecessor/successor operations as observed by other harts and external devices. An empty set establishes no ordering between operation pairs.
RV32I/RV64I; no general-register writeback. The EEI defines I/O versus R/W access classes. Other signaling observations and cache flushing are outside these ordering guarantees.
FENCE uses pred and succ fields to name predecessor and successor operation sets: I for device input, O for device output, R for memory reads, and W for memory writes. It constrains the ordering of memory and I/O operations made observable by the current hart to other harts or external devices; standard software must set reserved rd and rs1 fields to zero.
Shows the FENCE opcode encoding, fm/pred/succ fields, and current-hart observable ordering constraints without modeling cache, bus, or pipeline behavior.
This animation shows only FENCE/PAUSE architectural semantics defined by the RISC-V unprivileged ISA; it does not represent processor-specific pause duration, cache behavior, interconnect protocol, or execution cost.
FENCE is not a cache flush. It uses pred/succ bit sets to describe which predecessor operations must be observed before which successor operations.
Understand this scenario with real code like «fence rw, rw # full memory barrier: prior reads+writes before subsequent reads+writes».
When the EEI classifies the device accesses as I/O, fence iorw, iorw covers predecessor/successor device and memory ordering; fence rw, rw excludes the device I/O classes.
Understand this scenario with real code like «fence rw, rw # full memory barrier: prior reads+writes before subsequent reads+writes».
No. Its architectural semantics are ordering constraints, not a general cache flush.
No for I/O classes. Device input/output ordering requires the I or O bits as appropriate.
No. It constrains the order in which the current hart's relevant operations become observable to other observers.