How is MRET different from an ordinary JALR return?
MRET takes its target from mepc and also restores privilege plus interrupt-enable state; JALR only computes a register-plus-immediate PC target and may write a link register.
Machine trap return: pc<-mepc, return mode from mstatus.MPP and (with H) MPV, MIE<-MPIE, with MPIE, MPP, MPV, and related state updated as specified by the privileged architecture.
MRET is the privileged return instruction used by a machine-mode trap handler. It first determines the return mode from MPP and MPV in mstatus (or mstatush on RV32), then clears MPV, restores MIE from MPIE, sets MPIE to 1 and MPP to the least-privileged supported mode, and finally sets pc to mepc; a return below M also clears MPRV. MPV participates in virtualized return-mode selection only with H and is ignored when MPP=M. MRET is legal only in M-mode, and lower-privilege execution raises an illegal-instruction exception.
Starts from the fixed SYSTEM encoding, then shows xRET permission checks, EPC-to-PC restoration, and previous interrupt-enable / previous privilege field updates.
This animation shows core xRET state and MRET's MPV return branch; it does not model extension-conditioned state such as MDT or ELP, OS scheduling, handler body, pipeline behavior, latency, or platform policy.
MRET restores the return context saved for a machine-mode trap handler: PC comes from mepc, return mode from MPP and (with H) MPV, and interrupt enable from MPIE. It is not a function return or ordinary jump.
Understand this scenario with real code like «mret # Return from M-mode trap».
Understand this scenario with real code like «mret # Return from M-mode trap».
MRET takes its target from mepc and also restores privilege plus interrupt-enable state; JALR only computes a register-plus-immediate PC target and may write a link register.
No. Its encoding fixes rd to x0; its architectural effects are updates to PC, current privilege, and relevant mstatus fields.