Is it always equivalent to a same-named 32-bit instruction?
Not always. Some C/Zc instructions compress common 32-bit operations, while others have dedicated stack-frame or table-jump semantics.
RV64C: compressed 64-bit doubleword load; RV32 Zclsd: compressed load of a 64-bit value into an even/odd register pair.
C.LD uses the CL format with rd' and rs1' mapped to x8-x15. In RV64C it loads a 64-bit value from rs1' plus a zero-extended, 8-byte-scaled offset into rd'; in RV32 Zclsd the same encoding loads an even/odd destination register pair and requires an even destination.
Shows only official 16-bit fields, address/immediate calculation, and architectural state; it does not simulate a pipeline, cache, endianness implementation, or timing.
The EEI choice affects this result only when the effective address is not divisible by 8; a naturally aligned access must not raise an address-misaligned exception.
C.LD is the 16-bit encoding form for compressed doubleword load; its semantics and encodable register/immediate ranges must be read from the official C extension rules.
Understand this scenario with real code like «c.ld x8, 0(x10)».
Not always. Some C/Zc instructions compress common 32-bit operations, while others have dedicated stack-frame or table-jump semantics.
Many 16-bit encodings can represent only a compressed register subset or fixed registers such as sp, ra, a0/a1.