Check vl first
The current vl determines the number of body elements. Typical code executes vsetvli, vsetivli, or vsetvl before this instruction.
vector-vector signed integer division; writes each quotient to vd, and divide by zero does not trap.
VDIV.VV is a RISC-V V extension vector-vector signed integer divide instruction. Each active element uses vs2 as the dividend and the same-lane vs1 element as the divisor, computes the SEW-width quotient, and writes vd; zero divisors and signed overflow cases use the official specified results without a divide-by-zero trap.
Starts from OP-V encoding fields, then shows how VDIV computes each signed quotient and applies the official divide-by-zero and signed-overflow special cases.
vdiv.vv uses OP-V encoding. The animation places fixed fields, register fields, vm, and the vs1 field in one encoding strip.
This animation shows only ISA-visible relationships from the official V extension: OP-V field decode, active-element reads, SEW-width integer signed division, mask control, and vd writeback. It does not model pipelines, caches, or timing.
VDIV.VV does not raise a divide-by-zero exception. For active elements within the current vl, it reads vs2 as the dividend and the same-lane vs1 element as the divisor, writes the signed quotient, and with vm=0 only body elements whose v0.t bit is 1 execute.
When reading VDIV.VV, do not stop at the mnemonic. Official V-extension semantics also depend on the current vl, vtype, and mask state. .vv: two vector sources participate element by element.
The current vl determines the number of body elements. Typical code executes vsetvli, vsetivli, or vsetvl before this instruction.
The current vtype supplies SEW, LMUL, tail policy, and mask policy; these affect element width, register-group size, and inactive/tail destination elements.
For ordinary vector instructions with vm, vm=0 uses v0 as the execution mask and vm=1 is unmasked. A few forms such as VMERGE use v0 as data-selection input.
Understand this scenario with real code like «vsetvli t0, a0, e32, m1, ta, ma vdiv.vv v1, v2, v3, v0.t».
Understand this scenario with real code like «vsetvli t0, a0, e32, m1, ta, ma vdiv.vv v1, v2, v3, v0.t».
No. The official V extension defines the divide-by-zero result: the quotient is an all-ones bit pattern, and the instruction itself does not raise a divide-by-zero trap.
VDIV.VV writes the quotient; the paired VREM form writes the remainder for the same divide relation. Both use the same divide-by-zero and signed-overflow special-case rules.