Check vl first
The current vl determines the number of body elements. Typical code executes vsetvli, vsetivli, or vsetvl before this instruction.
Copies same-lane vs1 elements to vd body elements as an unmasked vector move.
VMV.V.V is an unmasked vector integer move form in the RISC-V V extension. It copies same-lane vs1 elements to vd body elements; the encoding fixes vm=1 and vs2=v0, and the syntax has no v0.t execution mask.
Starts from OP-V encoding fields, then shows how the unmasked VMV.V move form writes the current source value into vd body elements.
vmv.v.v uses OP-V encoding. The animation places fixed fields, register fields, vm, and the vs1 field in one encoding strip.
This animation shows only ISA-visible relationships from the official V extension: OP-V field decode, active-element reads, SEW-width integer same-lane copy, fixed unmasked move, and vd writeback. It does not model pipelines, caches, or timing.
VMV.V.V is an unmasked VMV.V vector copy form that copies same-lane body elements from vs1 to vd. It performs no arithmetic and no memory access.
When reading VMV.V.V, do not stop at the mnemonic. Official V-extension semantics also depend on the current vl, vtype, and mask state. The suffix and operand form determine whether sources are vector, scalar, or immediate values.
The current vl determines the number of body elements. Typical code executes vsetvli, vsetivli, or vsetvl before this instruction.
The current vtype supplies SEW, LMUL, tail policy, and mask policy; these affect element width, register-group size, and inactive/tail destination elements.
For ordinary vector instructions with vm, vm=0 uses v0 as the execution mask and vm=1 is unmasked. A few forms such as VMERGE use v0 as data-selection input.
Understand this scenario with real code like «vmv.v.v v1, v2 # copy body elements from v2 to v1».
Understand this scenario with real code like «vmv.v.v v1, v2 # copy body elements from v2 to v1».
No. VMV.V is an unmasked move form; use VMERGE when conditional selection under v0 is required.
No. It only copies bit patterns through registers and current body elements.