Is SFENCE.INVAL.IR the same as FENCE.I?
No. SFENCE.INVAL.IR orders implicit page-table references after Svinval invalidations; FENCE.I has different instruction-fetch synchronization semantics.
Svinval trailing ordering instruction: orders prior SINVAL/HINVAL invalidations before subsequent implicit page-table references.
SFENCE.INVAL.IR is the trailing ordering boundary for a split Svinval invalidation sequence and has no explicit assembly operands. It orders prior SINVAL.VMA, HINVAL.VVMA, or HINVAL.GVMA invalidations by the current hart before subsequent implicit references by that hart to memory-management data structures. It does not select a VA/ASID invalidation scope and is not an instruction-cache flush; the typical sequence is SFENCE.W.INVAL -> one or more SINVAL/HINVAL instructions -> SFENCE.INVAL.IR.
Shows the fixed SYSTEM encoding and ordering boundary in an Svinval sequence; this instruction has no explicit assembly operands.
This animation shows only the local-hart invalidation/ordering relation defined by the privileged architecture; it does not simulate TLB structures, cache flushes, page-walk latency, IPIs, or OS shootdown protocols.
SFENCE.INVAL.IR is the closing bracket of an Svinval sequence: it orders prior invalidations before later implicit page-table references.
Understand this scenario with real code like «sfence.inval.ir».
Understand this scenario with real code like «sfence.inval.ir».
Understand this scenario with real code like «sfence.inval.ir».
Understand this scenario with real code like «sfence.inval.ir».
No. SFENCE.INVAL.IR orders implicit page-table references after Svinval invalidations; FENCE.I has different instruction-fetch synchronization semantics.
It is the trailing ordering boundary, ensuring prior SINVAL/HINVAL invalidations precede later implicit memory-management references.